Showing posts with label general strike. Show all posts
Showing posts with label general strike. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Ten Principles All Unions Should Be Built Upon



I found this list of precepts from the International Longshore and Warehouse Union(ILWU).  The ILWU is a militant, independent union that most unions could learn a few things from.  The ILWU honors every picket line, which I have written about before here. The ILWU has a long history of successful labor actions and an extremely active membership.  The following is a list of the ILWU's ten guiding principles.  The labor movement would do well to adopt them across the board.

 
I
A Union is built on its members. The  strength, understanding and unity of the membership can determine the union’s  course and its advancements. The members who work, who make up the union and pay  its dues can best determine their own destiny. If the facts are honestly  presented to the members in the ranks, they will best judge what should be done  and how it should be done. In brief, it is the membership of the union which is  the best judge of its own welfare; not the officers, not the employers, not the  politicians and the fair weather friends of labor. Above all, this approach is based on the conviction that given the truth and an  opportunity to determine their own course of action, the rank and file in 99  cases out of 100 will take the right path in their own interests and in the  interests of all the people.

II 
 Labor unity is at all times the key for  a successful economic advancement. Anything that detracts from labor unity hurts  all labor. Any group of workers which decides to put itself above other workers  through craft unionism or through cozy deals at the expense of others will in  the long run gain but little and inevitably will lose both its substance and its  friends. No matter how difficult the going, a union must fight in every possible way to  advance the principle of labor unity.

III 
 Workers are indivisible. There can be  no discrimination because of race, color, creed, national origin, religious or  political belief. Any division among the workers can help no one but the  employers. Discrimination of worker against worker is suicide. Discrimination is  a weapon of the boss. Its entire history is proof that it has served no other  purpose than to pit worker against worker to their own destruction.

IV
“To help any worker in  distress” must be a daily guide in the life of every trade union and its  individual members. Labor solidarity means just that. Unions have to accept the fact  that the solidarity of labor stands above all else, including even the so-called  sanctity of the contract. We cannot adopt for ourselves the policies of union  leaders who insist that because they have a contract, their members are  compelled to perform work even behind a picket line. Every picket line must be respected as though it were our own.

V
Any union, if it is to fulfill its appointed task, must put aside all internal  differences and issues to combine for the common cause of advancing the welfare  of the membership. No union can successfully fulfill its purpose in life if it  allows itself to be distracted by any issue which causes division in its ranks  and undermines the unity which all labor must have in the face of the employer.

VI
 The days are long gone when a union can consider dealing with single employers.  The powerful financial interests of the country are bound together in every  conceivable type of united organization to promote their own welfare and to  resist the demands of labor. Labor can no more win with the ancient weapons of  taking on a single employer in industry any more than it can hope to win through  the worn-out dream of withholding its skill until an employer sues for peace.  The employers of this country are part of a well-organized, carefully  coordinated, effective fighting machine. They can be met only on equal  terms, which requires industry-wide bargaining and the most extensive economic  strength of organized labor.

VII 
 Just as water flows to its lowest level, so do wages if the bulk of  the workers are left unorganized. The day of craft unionism – the aristocracy of  labor – was over when mass production methods were introduced. To organize the  unorganized must be a cardinal principle of any union worth its salt; and to  accomplish this is not merely in the interest of the unorganized, it is for the  benefit of the organized as well.

VIII
   The basic aspiration and desires of the workers throughout the world are the  same. Workers are workers the world over. International solidarity, particularly  to maritime workers, is essential to their protection and a guarantee of reserve  economic power in times of strife.

IX
 A new type of unionism is called for which does not confine its ambitions and  demands only to wages. Conditions of work, security of employment and adequate  provisions for the workers and their families in times of need are of equal, if  not greater importance, than the hourly wage.

X
Jurisdictional warfare and jurisdictional raiding must be outlawed by labor  itself. Nothing can do as much damage to the ranks of labor and to the principle  of labor unity and solidarity as jurisdictional bickering and raiding among  unions. Both public support and strike victories and jeopardized by  jurisdictional warfare. This code for rank and file unionism is implemented by the membership’s  participation in organization, negotiations, strike machinery, contract  enforcement and every other aspect of union life. Thus, its discipline springs  out of participation, conviction and the right of the membership to decide its  own course of action. The above principles and steps to implement them, and an  informed and alert membership make the union what it is.

In Solidarity,

Joseph

Tuesday, May 7, 2013

What Is May Day?



This past week, workers from around the globe commemorated the 127th anniversary of the massacre at Haymarket Square, where four unarmed workers were shot and killed by police who were attempting to breakup a general strike.  Remembrance of this tragic event became known as International Workers' Day, or May Day. 

May Day is an official holiday in over 80 countries, but you rarely hear anything about May Day in the United States.  Why is that?  To be frank, the big labor federations in the United States have long been in bed with federal agencies that are controlled by anti-worker corporate interests, as well as participating in class-collaboration with corporations themselves.  It was in this spirit that the Knights of Labor went along with Grover Cleveland's endeavor to sweep the Haymarket Affair under the rug by creating Labor Day in September.

So just what were the workers fighting for with their general strike in Haymarket Square?  A little thing you might recognize called the eight hour work day.  Four innocent workers gave their lives to secure that right that is so often taken for granted.  Today, you can barely get workers to organize because people are afraid of losing their $9 an hour job, when we are able to work a normal work week because workers just like us were willing to sacrifice to make sure the next generation had better working conditions than they enjoyed.

So my question is, what are you willing to sacrifice for the workers of tomorrow?

Just a thought.

In Solidarity,

Joseph

P.S. - Here are a few links if you are interested in learning more about the labor movement outside the United States:

Eric Lee from LabourStart has just published a book that will introduce you to the various labor federations from around the world.  You can find it here: https://www.createspace.com/4252731

To see what a real labor federation looks like, check out the World Federation of Trade Unions.

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

It's Time To Strike The No Strike/No Lockout Clause



Much has been said by various leaders in the labor movement over the last several years about the lack of solidarity in the labor movement, yet most of them seem to ignore one of the biggest causes of this problem - The No Strike/No Lockout Clause in most union contracts.

Admittedly, the plus side is very attractive to union leaders and workers:  The company agrees not to lock you out for the duration of the contract.  Well, at least they say they won't lock you out.  These rules may not apply if you work for Albertsons, Ralph's, Sterling Chemical, Castlewood Country Club...you get the point.

Unfortunately, the down side to a No/Strike/No Lockout clause is a huge one.  Not only are workers barred from going on strike, it bans just about any labor action, including leafletting, picketing, and slow-downs.  Bigger than the issues just mentioned is that most of these clauses prohibit sympathy strikes, and forces members to become scabs and cross picket lines of other unions.

It would seem to me that if the leaders of today's labor movement are searching for the reasons that workers aren't as united as we were 60-80 years ago, this might have something to do with it.  In exchange for not locking us out, which is not always effective, especially if the workers get into the plant and have a sit-down strike, the labor movement has signed over our most effective weapons:

1. The ability to control our own labor.
2. The ability to unite with other workers to effect commerce.

Without these weapons, the labor movement has become soft, weakened, isolated, and although it pains me to say it: corporatist.

So how do we solve this problem? Well, there are a few ways.  Some are more radical(effective), and some are more moderate(somewhat less effective).

1. Remove the No Strike/No Lockout Clause completely.  Instead of wasting time and money on arbitration cases that drag on forever, change the grievance procedure where any class action that is not solved at the 3rd step can result in a strike.  Of course, this means that unions will actually have to mobilize workers, which is what our purpose is supposed to be in the first place.

2. Keep the No Strike/No Lockout Clause, but retain the right to picket and leaflet.

3. Keep the right for sympathy/general strikes.  At the very least refuse to cross picket lines.  What the hell ever convinced the labor movement that it was alright to force our members to become scabs?

If you want real solidarity and a united labor movement, this would be a good start.

In Solidarity,

Joseph

Tuesday, April 19, 2011

The 16th Congress of the World Federation of Trade Unions


From April 6th - 11th, 2011, delegates from 210 organizations in over 120 countries, representing over 78 million members gathered in Athens, Greece for the 16th Congress of the World Federation of Trade Unions.  Unfortunately, this exciting event that is held every five years is largely unknown to the majority of the labor movement in the United States.

Why is this?

Actually, there are a few different reasons.

1. Where Are Our Leaders?  I'll start with a little history lesson.  A century ago, the American labor movement was robust, active, and had leaders who transcended the labor movement and galvanized the working class as a whole in the United States.  Leaders like Eugene Debs, Mother Jones, Joe Hill, to name a few.  Who can we name in the last three decades that is anywhere near the level of leader with anywhere close to the level of influence as the figures I mentioned above?  Sadly, the answer is no one.  Our lack of leadership in the United States to galvanize the working class against the ruling class is just one reason why we don't even hear about major labor events such as the WFTU's 16th Congress.  This brings me to my next point, which is why we haven't had any leaders.

2. The Purge -  In the 1940's and 1950's, the ruling class pulled off one of the greatest strategical moves in labor history.  Learning the lesson of Joe Hill(kill them, and you make them a martyr), the ruling class figured out a way to get the labor movement to get rid of their most effective leaders.  That's right - a little thing called Loyalty Oaths.  Sadly, big labor in the United States went right along with this idiotic exercise, expelling the most active and vocal leaders and organizations(UE, anyone?), and keeping the class collaborators.  The effects of this event still resonate and shape today's labor movement.  Have you ever notice that you can't start a union meeting without the pledge of allegiance or the national anthem?  I'm not saying those are bad things, but it is very telling that labor is still stuck in that mindset of having everyone prove their Americanism before every meeting.

3. Class Collaboration - The labor movement today is a far cry from its militant predecessor.  Instead of calling for the working class to unite and smack the ruling class back into reality, big labor has settled into the cozy setting of labor management forums and the bureaucracy of the toothless and cumbersome NLRB.  Our conventions are held at casino's and resorts, where we spend members' money on lavish dinners for officials.  This is the same activity that we complain about when it is corporations that are doing it.

4. Strike? What Strike? - In the United States, we have all but given up our best, and most powerful weapon of all - the ability to withhold our labor to deny profit to the ruling class in order to receive our fair share.  Most standard union contracts contain a "no-strike" clause in them.  This also barres unions from refusing to cross a picket line, or joining sympathy, or general strikes.  This is designed to keep the working class from uniting across industry lines.  Unless we bring back our most powerful weapon - which by the way, is used heavily, and with great success by WFTU unions - our movement will continue to wither away. It's time for us to return to our militant, grassroots, sit-down strike origins.

All of this brings me back to why the WFTU is largely unknown in the United States.  The WFTU believes in an open, democratic, militant membership.  They do not believe in discriminating against people with various political beliefs.  Most importantly, the do not believe in class collaboration, and openly call for combating capitalism and the unity of the working class in the struggle against the ruling class.

You can find out more about the WFTU, and their 16th Congress here:

http://www.wftucentral.org/?language=en

In Solidarity,

Joseph


Tuesday, February 8, 2011

More Strikes in Egypt

http://af.reuters.com/article/egyptNews/idAFLDE7171EG20110208?sp=true


If these workers can coordinate with the massive protests that are ongoing, this could be very useful in uniting areas of the country that have not been as involved so far.  If this happens, it becomes impossible for Mubarak to stay in office.

In Solidarity,

Joseph

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Egypt: General Strikes and Revolution


As the world watches the situation in Egypt, the tension in the rest of the Arab world is going mostly unnoticed.  Yemen, the most impoverished country in the region, has been experiencing ongoing, peaceful general strikes for several weeks.  It seems that if the Egyptian people are successful, as I believe they will be, in democratizing their country, that several countries in the region will follow suit.

It will be interesting to see what role the trade unions will take in the coming days and weeks ahead.  As we have learned over the course of history, general strikes are one of the most effective methods to bring about social and political change.

Let's stand in solidarity with our sisters and brothers in the Arab world as they fight to democratize their countries and to control their own destiny!

In Solidarity,

Joseph